In recent years, numerous new classifications of security solutions have emerged in an attempt to mitigate a continuous stream of risks. One such category is Automated Security Verification (ASV), which presents the adversary’s viewpoint of weaknesses and enables security teams to continually confirm vulnerabilities, security protocols, and remedies on a large scale. ASV plays a vital role in any cybersecurity plan, offering a clearer understanding of potential weaknesses and exposures within the organization, thereby allowing security teams to identify flaws before they are exploited.
Nevertheless, relying solely on ASV can be constraining. Throughout this piece, we will explore how merging the intricate vulnerability insights from ASV with the comprehensive analysis of the Continuous Threat Exposure Management Framework (CTEM) can enable your security teams to make well-informed decisions and allocate resources efficiently. (Interested in delving deeper into CTEM? Take a look at this detailed guide to kickstarting CTEM.)
Background Information: ASV Delivers an In-Depth Overview
ASV stands as a crucial aspect of any contemporary cybersecurity scheme. It can thwart high-impact assaults by employing validation to sift out exposures that do not jeopardize your essential assets and to authenticate remediation that diminishes risk. Additionally, it can enhance efficiency by automatically validating that security protocols are properly configured, thus saving time on analyzing and addressing low-risk exposures. Furthermore, it enhances efficacy by ensuring the efficacy of your security tool investments in repelling cyber attacks and adhering to regulations and policies. (Psst, XM Cyber was recently hailed as “the indisputable leader” in Frost & Sullivan’s 2024 ASV Radar Report – curious to know why? Discover the report here!)
By streamlining the verification process, you can diminish the dependency on manual testing, conserving time and resources while boosting precision and coverage. Embracing a proactive strategy such as this enables organizations to pinpoint and rectify security loopholes, thereby upholding defense against emerging threats.
Furthermore:
- ASV furnishes an exhaustive perspective. Conventional security methods may overlook concealed assets or neglect vulnerabilities concealed within user accounts or security guidelines. ASV eradicates these blind spots by conducting a thorough inventory, enabling security teams to rectify weaknesses before malicious actors can exploit them.
- ASV transcends simple discovery. ASV solutions evaluate vulnerabilities within each asset and prioritize them based on their potential impact on critical assets. This empowers security teams to concentrate their efforts on the most urgent threats.
- ASV boasts scalability. ASV’s scalability renders it suitable for organizations of all sizes. For smaller teams, ASV automates the laborious tasks linked to asset discovery and vulnerability evaluation, liberating scarce resources for other undertakings. For large enterprises, ASV offers the required scale to efficiently oversee their ever-expanding attack surface.
- ASV aligns with regulatory frameworks. Endeavors such as the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), the National and Information Security (NIS2) Directive, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) all advocate for continual validation of an organization’s security stance. Implementing an ASV solution demonstrates commitment to complying with these and other frameworks.
Despite Its Merits, ASV Alone Falls Short
Attack Surface Verification stands as a robust solution offering a comprehensive view of an organization’s attack surface, prioritizing vulnerabilities based on risk, and streamlining tasks for enhanced efficiency. It serves as a valuable asset, yet it lacks adequacy as the sole foundation for a thorough and efficient cybersecurity strategy. It does pinpoint certain risks but does not necessarily present a holistic view of your security posture.
Without examining your attack surface and identifying vulnerabilities that could jeopardize your organization,
Relying solely on ASV may keep security teams in the shadows. Additionally, certain ASV tools utilized in real-time scenarios can endanger business operations or provide an entry point for cybercriminals later on. Hence, integrating it into a more extensive framework like the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) framework is crucial to optimize advantages and address potential constraints.
Integration of ASV within CTEM
Since its establishment in 2022, the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) framework has demonstrated itself as a highly successful strategy for risk mitigation and security enhancement. Unlike isolated methods, CTEM offers a proactive cybersecurity approach that goes beyond just identifying vulnerabilities. Comprising five interconnected phases – scoping, discovery, prioritization, validation (where ASV is situated), and mobilization – CTEM consistently recognizes and ranks threats to your business, empowering Security and IT teams to respond to the most impactful issues first.
By utilizing ASV to fulfil the 4th step of the CTEM framework, organizations can comprehend how attacks may happen and the probability of their occurrence. Crucially, when paired with the exposure assessment in the 3rd step of CTEM (you can explore more about this 3rd step of CTEM, prioritization, here), high-impact exposures can be pinpointed and rectified efficiently.
Through the combination of ASV and exposure assessment capabilities, organizations can thwart high-impact attacks and achieve effectiveness in remediation that ASV alone cannot deliver.
ASV – Enhancing CTEM’s 4th Step, Validation
This broader view provided by CTEM complements the strengths of ASV and enables more precise threat ranking, streamlined remediation, and an overall stronger security stance. ASV becomes more valuable and dependable when integrated with comprehensive discovery, evaluation, and prioritization of vulnerabilities and exposures throughout the hybrid environment.
Incorporating ASV into CTEM permits organizations to leverage the benefits of both methodologies. Together, they empower security teams to make well-informed decisions, efficiently allocate resources, and minimize overall organizational risk. The fusion of ASV with CTEM allows organizations to adopt a holistic, preemptive, and efficient strategy in managing cyber risks.
You might find the series on the 5 Stages of CTEM intriguing. Through this blog series, we offer an in-depth insight into each stage to help organizations customize the adoption of CTEM according to their requirements and objectives:
About Author
