Apple Abandons Legal Case Against NSO Group Due to Fear of Exposing Intelligence Information
Apple decided to dismiss its legal action against the NSO Group, a vendor of surveillance software, due to concerns about potential exposure of crucial “threat intelligence” data.
As per a report from The Washington Post released on Friday, this development became public.
The tech giant mentioned that its collective efforts with industry peers and governments to combat the increasing use of surveillance software have significantly impacted the accused.
“Regrettably, new unethical entities have surfaced in the surveillance software sector,” stated the company. “The confluence of these circumstances has led Apple to seek the withdrawal of this lawsuit voluntarily.”
“Although Apple remains confident in the validity of its allegations, it is concerned that further litigation could jeopardize critical security details,” the company further explained.
Apple originally lodged a complaint against the Israeli firm in November 2021, accusing it of illegally using the Pegasus surveillance system to target users.
The company labeled NSO Group, a branch of Q Cyber Technologies Limited, as “unscrupulous modern-day soldiers for hire who have devised extremely advanced cyber-surveillance tools that encourage widespread and blatant misuse.”
Earlier this year, a federal judge rejected NSO Group’s request to dismiss the lawsuit on the argument that the firm is “headquartered in Israel and Apple should have pursued legal action there,” indicating that “Apple’s claims align perfectly with the anti-hacking objectives of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act], and NSO has failed to prove otherwise.”
![]() |
| The global spyware market |
Apple, in its motion to withdraw the case, emphasized three main reasons for its decision: the risk of exposing critical threat intelligence data used for protecting against surveillance attacks, mentioning a report from The Guardian dated July 25, 2024.
The British publication disclosed that Israeli authorities seized NSO Group’s documents in July 2020 to prevent the release of details about the notorious spy tool as part of its legal battle with Meta-owned WhatsApp, which filed a similar lawsuit in 2019.
“These seizures were part of a unique legal strategy devised by Israel to obstruct the dissemination of information regarding Pegasus, believing that it would cause ‘significant diplomatic and security repercussions’ for the country,” noted The Guardian during that period.
Apple also cited the evolving landscape of surveillance software businesses and the emergence of numerous new players, as well as the likelihood of divulging to external parties “the techniques Apple uses to thwart surveillance while defendants and others create substantial roadblocks to obtaining an effective solution.”
The development coincides with the Atlantic Council’s disclosure about individuals behind surveillance software firms in Israel, Italy, and India, some of whom have faced scrutiny for enabling authoritarian regimes to spy on human rights advocates, political opposition, and journalists, engaging in activities such as renaming companies, launching new ventures, or strategically changing jurisdictions.

For instance, Intellexa, the now-sanctioned entity behind the Predator surveillance tool, has reappeared with fresh infrastructure, potentially serving clients in regions like Angola, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and Saudi Arabia.
“Predator’s operators have significantly enhanced their infrastructure by introducing additional layers of complexity to evade detection,” mentioned cybersecurity firm Recorded Future’s Insikt Group in a statement.
“The new infrastructure includes an extra tier in its multi-level delivery system, which anonymizes customer activities, making it more challenging to discern the countries utilizing the surveillance software.”


