Tutorial: Understanding KMI (Key Management Infrastructure)
One of the key components of contemporary information security is encryption. Encryption is a sophisticated domain centered around the ongoing battle between individuals striving to develop secure ways to encode and encrypt data both at rest and in transit, and those attempting to undermine that encryption.
Encryption is widely employed. The majority of websites employ SSL (Secure Socket Layer) for data security between your device and their hosting servers. Platforms like Google Drive employ encryption within their servers, making access possible only through authorized accounts.
Conversely, robust encryption standards are integral to NIST security controls for FedRAMP and CMMC. ISO 27001 strongly advocates for cryptographic standards protecting business data.
Without encryption, digital security is non-existent. Anyone who gains access to data, whether by opening a door to it or peeping through a window, can easily interpret it.
So, how does KMI fit into all of this? KMI, Key Management Infrastructure, is a crucial element of current-day cryptography. To grasp its significance, let’s delve into a brief explanation of encryption.
The Fundamentals of Encryption
Encryption involves transforming useful data – whether a simple sentence or a large file – into unintelligible content for unauthorized individuals. It’s a practice commonly seen among children sharing notes at school and in government operations for security purposes.
For instance, consider a Caesar cipher or ROT cipher. Take this sentence:
“This is a test sentence.”
After applying an encryption method, you get:
“Guvf vf n grfg fragrapr.”
A Caesar Cipher, for instance, shifts the alphabet letters by a set number of steps. A ROT-5 cipher shifts each letter by five places: A becomes F, B becomes G, and so on.
The “key” in this case is the number required to shift the letters to decode the text. In this instance, it’s ROT13, a commonly used option.
Obviously, this simplistic method isn’t secure. It’s easy to spot, decode, and not suitable for safeguarding sensitive data. Nonetheless, it serves as a good example to illustrate the concept of a key – the essential information for encrypting/decrypting data.
Modern cryptography necessitates intricate mathematics and factorials to create scrambled data that requires a specific key for decryption. The complexity of the algorithm directly affects its security; simpler algorithms can be cracked through brute force, underscoring the importance of a secure key.
Efficiently managing keys for encrypted data is crucial. If the key is compromised, the encryption becomes worthless.
Deciphering Key Management Infrastructure
Understanding the significance of keys and their management underscores the critical nature of key management infrastructure or KMI. But what exactly is KMI in a practical context?
Per NIST, KMI is defined as:
“The framework and services responsible for the generation, production, storage, safeguarding, dissemination, control, tracking, and disposal of all cryptographic keying material, including symmetric and public keys and certificates.”
KMI is an integral part of encryption, which falls under COMSEC, within the broader spectrum of InfoSEC. Consequently, different organizations have varied definitions, permissible paradigms, and sets of hardware/software to oversee it.
In our domain at Ignyte, we primarily focus on the interaction between private enterprises and the government through frameworks like FedRAMP and CMMC. Hence, concerning KMI, we adhere to governmental mandates.
Within this realm, while COMSEC may have disparate interpretations and rules across various entities like different military branches or government contractors, KMI remains consistent. Government-sanctioned KMI originates from programs under the National Security Agency.
The NSA initiated the planning for KMI back in 1999, signifying a modern iteration from the previous EKMS (Electronic Key Management Systems) paradigm. Any government system requiring NSA-approved security must utilize this NSA-endorsed KMI system. Military branches, Department of Defense agencies, federal bodies, and even coalition partners and government allies all adhere to this system.
Technically, KMI integrates digital and physical services, encompassing algorithms for key generation, software for encryption/decryption, and hardware for key management/authentication. Some physical components include:
- Barcode scanners
- Physical authentication tokens
- HAIPEs (High Assurance Internet Protocol Encryptors)
- AKPs (Advanced Key Processors)
Notably, KMI excludes individual training or behavior, which falls under COMSEC’s purview, rather than being part of KMI itself.
Advantages of NSA KMI
Utilizing the NSA-provided key management infrastructure offers several benefits. Foremost is the encryption itself. Given the NSA’s expertise in encryption technologies and their position as a leader in encryption and decryption practices, adhering to NSA standards ensures top-notch encryption.
Another significant benefit is the comprehensive support and management provided by the NSA for their KMI systems. Prior to this initiative, key management was primarily delegated to individual departments and contractors, resulting in varying standards of implementation and costly support mechanisms.
Furthermore, the standardization of KMI systems ensures interoperability across different entities. Various military branches, for example, utilize the same KMI systems, facilitating seamless operations without unnecessary friction, extending to defense contractors within the ecosystem.
Requisite for NSA KMI
Having expounded on encryption, KMI, and their associated benefits, the pivotal question arises: Who needs NSA KMI?
The NSA extends its key management infrastructure to agencies, departments, military components, and defense contractors that require it. However, if you’re reading this, chances are you fall outside these categories.
At Ignyte, our focus predominantly revolves around security and authentication frameworks such as CMMC and FedRAMP. These frameworks specifically cater to companies aiming to engage with government bodies as contractors handling CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information).
Of particular note is the emphasis on the term “Unclassified” within these frameworks. While encryption is mandated, NSA-standard KMI isn’t a necessity.
This is due to the limited accessibility of NSA-provided KMI. Widely disseminating it heightens the risk of adversaries compromising the systems. NSA KMI predominantly targets entities beyond those encompassed by CMMC, primarily business partners and associates.
public authorities handling classified information. It is a critical matter, regarded with great importance, and necessitates more than standard off-the-shelf encryption protocols at that level.
This is demonstrated by the fact that the documentation related to NSA’s Key Management Infrastructure (KMI) systems is not readily accessible unless you are using a Department of Defense (DoD) authenticated system.
Hence, a company striving to clear a CMMC audit may utilize encryption methods without the specific need for authentication token devices or items like AKPs or HAIPEs. While these could enhance security, it is deemed unnecessary at that particular level and might potentially introduce risks to systems that genuinely require it.
NSA’s KMI solution is utilised by the NSA itself, various other entities within the Department of Defense, other governmental bodies, the armed forces, and a limited pool of local business partners dealing with classified and confidential information. Some allied agencies might also make use of it.
Can You Embrace NSA’s KMI?
No.
As a general rule, unless you are involved in managing genuinely classified data, access to NSA’s key management infrastructure will be out of reach.
When discussing frameworks such as CMMC, it is often highlighted that it is mandatory for government contractors. Nonetheless, a private corporation could adopt these methods (or even pursue certification) to exhibit their security posture and potentially secure contracts.
This principle is applicable to scenarios where Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is managed, but not when classified data is in play. In some ways, NSA’s KMI seems unattainable for all but the most reputable entities.
Nonetheless, if you handle data of significant sensitivity and desire top-tier security akin to NSA’s KMI, alternative solutions are accessible.
Private Sector KMI
Efficient management of keys is crucial for any encrypted systems, even beyond governmental entities. While one could argue that it might always lag behind what the NSA provides, and that the NSA might have ways to infiltrate non-NSA systems – safeguarding security against non-national threats remains imperative.
Although utilizing the term “KMI” specifically refers to the NSA’s implementation, key management is an extensively discussed concept in the security domain.
In the corporate setup, key management encompasses managing potentially hundreds or thousands of encryption keys concurrently and ensuring their security throughout the key’s life cycle:
1. Generating the encryption key
2. Distributing the encryption key to authorized users
3. Safely storing the key where it is accessible to authorized users only
4. Using the encryption key for cryptographic purposes
5. Rotating keys regularly to maintain continuous security
6. Revoking and eliminating keys when they are no longer required
Commercial key management can be executed via hardware security, key management services, or open-source key management frameworks. Numerous firms offer key management services, catering to a broad range of industries.
Therefore, if you are a business and seek a form of key management to bolster your security measures, various options are available. These might not completely align with the objectives you aim to achieve through CMMC or other common security frameworks, but they offer an enhanced level of protection over less vigilant practices.
How can we be of assistance? At Ignyte, while we do not offer key management or encryption services, we have collaborated with military bodies like the Air Force on projects such as the Ignyte Assurance Platform development. It is not within our scope to intrude upon NSA’s domain in this context.
If you aspire to become part of the Defense Industrial Base or collaborate with the federal authorities, and need to comply with standards within frameworks like DFARs, CMMC, or FedRAMP, we are here to assist. Do not hesitate to reach out anytime! For organizations seeking elevated security levels and considering the utilization of NSA’s key management infrastructure, it is advisable to engage with the program management office directly. Alternatively, if non-NSA key management services are sought, an array of commercial options can be explored to cater to various requirements.
About Author
