Implementing multifactor authentication (MFA) stands as one of the most powerful methods to boost security. In recent years, the adoption of apps like Google Authenticator has streamlined the authentication process.
Nonetheless, for various reasons such as privacy apprehensions, limited updates (particularly with open-source alternatives), or personal preferences, many individuals opt to steer clear of Google Authenticator.
Thankfully, there exists a plethora of competitors in the market, each bringing its own unique benefits. Here is a selection of the top alternatives to Google Authenticator.
Comparison table of the Best Google Authenticator Replacements
| Product name | Pricing | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Authenticator: Ideal for a reputable choice | Free |
|
| Twilio Authy: Perfect for secure backups and multiple devices | 5 cents per successful verification plus standard fees per channel |
|
| Cisco Duo: Tailored for enterprises | Free for up to 10 users Essentials: $3 per user, per month Advantage: $6 per user, per month Premium: $9 per user, per month |
|
| Yubico Security Key: Specialized for a physical security key | Yubico security keys come in various models and configurations, each with different prices based on factors like model, connectivity― including USB-A, USB-C, and near-field communication (NFC)―and features |
|
| FreeOTP: Optimal choice for an open-source substitute | Free |
|
Microsoft Authenticator: Ideal for a ‘big-name’ choice
For individuals seeking a well-established and renowned provider, my suggestion is Microsoft Authenticator. Compatible with Android and iOS, Microsoft Authenticator delivers a comparable experience to Google’s, supporting both Microsoft and non-Microsoft
accounts.
No passkeys are needed. Accounts are reachable using a personal identification number (PIN), fingerprint, or facial recognition. The feature I particularly admire is the ability to backup credentials to the cloud, which necessitates a private Microsoft account, while iOS users also must link to an iCloud account.
Reasons for Selecting Microsoft Authenticator
In my view, as a substantial, well-established corporation, Microsoft and the Microsoft Authenticator team can offer a strong level of assistance for users encountering queries or problems with the product. It can also provide consistent updates to introduce new functionalities and address any software bugs.
Cost
- Available for free download from Apple Store or Google Play Store.
Characteristics
- Delivers Two-Factor Authentication (2FA).
- Enables passwordless access.
- Supports push notifications.
- Facilitates MFA.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Microsoft Authenticator
| Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|
| 2FA and MFA offer an added layer of protection. | Not all services support Microsoft Authentication for 2FA or MFA, affecting its utility. |
| User-friendly with Microsoft accounts and other compatible services. | Users need to have the app installed on their mobile device for 2FA or MFA, posing challenges if the device is misplaced or unavailable. |
| Intuitive interface with push notification approval for MFA. | |
| Supports various authentication techniques, including biometrics and phone sign-in. |
Twilio Authy: Optimum Choice for Backups and Multiple Gadgets
VIEW: Authy vs Google Authenticator (TechRepublic)
Reasons behind Choosing Twilio Authy
Cost
- Twilio applies a charge of 5 cents per successful verification plus standard channel fees for the basic version inclusive of 2FA, with tailored pricing available for advanced features.
Characteristics
- Two-Factor Authentication (2FA).
- Synchronization among multiple devices.
- Soft token and backup services.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
- Time-based One-Time Passwords (TOTP).
Twilio Authy: the Upsides and Downsides
| Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|
| Support for 2FA and MFA using various authentication methods. | Access to advanced features and customization requires opting for the premium plan. |
| The soft token feature removes the need for a physical hardware token. | |
| Straightforward setup process and user-friendly interface. | |
| Synchronization across multiple gadgets allows users to access 2FA codes on different devices. |
Cisco Duo: Ideal for Enterprises
VIEW: Best Authenticator Apps for 2024 (TechRepublic)
as a part of the most recent updates, important additions consist of a public preview for Verified Duo Push. This functionality enhances security by requiring users to input an additional verification code with push requests. SMS codes have also been upgraded for easier readability by mobile browsers, enabling seamless authentication without user intervention.
One of the key advantages of Cisco as an MFA solution is its integration within a suite of software that caters to setting up and managing various IT functionalities, such as remote access and access control. While this feature targets commercial clientele, it is reflected in the pricing structure.
While many alternatives to Google Authenticator are free but may have limited options, opting for Duo entails additional benefits at a cost. The free tier, recommended by Cisco for individuals and small teams, closely aligns with Google’s offering and is sufficient for many. However, there is competition from alternatives like Authy. For advanced features and desktop access offered by Duo, or for organizations with more than 10 users, a per-user payment model applies. Pricing starts at $3 monthly per user, going up to $9 or even higher depending on the feature set required.
If you are also considering Microsoft Authenticator as an alternative, you can find more information in our article comparing Cisco Duo vs Microsoft Authenticator.
Reasons for selecting Cisco Duo
Implementing MFA for large enterprises can be intricate. However, Cisco stands out due to its Duo Policy Engine, which enables organizations to manage access levels and permissions tailored to user attributes like location, device health, and more.
Pricing
- Up to 10 users are free, Essentials cost $3 per user per month, Advantage is $6 per user per month, and Premium is $9 per user per month.
Features
- Adaptive authentication.
- Single Sign-On (SSO).
- Passwordless authentication.
- Comprehensive device monitoring.
Cisco Duo advantages and disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Offers a robust package for zero-trust access. | Costly for large organizations aiming for advanced features with many users. |
| Enables VPN-less remote access to secure resources. | May require intricate setup, posing challenges for non-technical users. |
| Intuitive interface for both end users and administrators. | |
| Ensures complete device integrity through endpoint protection. |
Yubico Security Key: Optimal for a physical security key
If your business requires a physical security key, I recommend considering the Yubico Security Key. This alternative to Google Authenticator provides distinct features. Instead of relying on an application installed on a device, Yubico offers a physical key serving as an authenticator. Available in USB-A and USB-C iterations, this key seamlessly integrates with major websites, password managers, and other software applications.
Usage is simple, with comprehensive and easy-to-follow documentation, and the key itself is durable and reliable. In addition to standard USB connectivity, mobile app authentication through touch-and-go is supported. Yubico extends its offerings with advanced models like the YubiKey Bio series, which incorporates biometric security with a fingerprint sensor. This adaptability caters to diverse feature needs, business requirements, and use cases.
The YubiKey 5 series, the latest release, introduces more options such as passwordless authentication, 2FA using a password and an authenticator, as well as MFA via passwordless verification and a personal identification number (PIN). The product also supports a broad range of phishing-resistant authentication protocols like FIDO2/WebAuthn and Personal Identity Verification Smart Card.
Pricing varies depending on organization size and the choice between outright purchase or subscription. Subscribing may offer discounts to larger enterprises, while individuals and small firms may prefer a one-time purchase if they are confident in not misplacing their keys.
SEE: Multi-factor Authentication Deployment Guide (TechRepublic Premium)
Reasons for choosing Yubico Security Key
I endorse Yubico due to its convenient physical security keys offering phishing-resistant authentication protocols and a vulnerability-free approach compared to mobile MFA methods. The keys are user-friendly, compatible with various online services and applications, and extend security to computers and physical locations.
Pricing
- Yubico security keys are available in different models and configurations, each priced accordingly. The cost depends on factors like model, connectivity options (USB-A, USB-C, NFC, etc.), and key features.
Features
- 2FA support.
- FIDO2 and U2F compatibility.
- Support for multiple protocols.
- Physical security features.
Yubico Security Key advantages and disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Robust authentication with support for FIDO2 and U2F. | Expense of hardware security keys can be a drawback for some. |
| Compatiblewith a variety of platforms and services, improving flexibility and usability. | Requiring the physical security key for authentication might render them less user-friendly compared to mobile-based authentication methods. |
| Offers a superior level of defense against account compromise. | |
| Login without passwords, enhancing user experience and security. |
FreeOTP: Exceptional for an open-source substitute
For those who value transparency and privacy, I recommend exploring FreeOTP. An issue with Google Authenticator is its lack of open-source status, with the relevant repositories not being updated for several years. This isn’t a concern with FreeOTP, as it’s entirely open source.
The latest major release of FreeOTP is Version 2. It brought forth a fresh material design interface, default branding for major services, and the option to back up and restore tokens. Subsequently, three minor updates have been rolled out, addressing various bugs and making slight improvements.
Accessible on both Android and iOS, this authentication app is reasonably lightweight and simplistic, both in terms of user experience and functionalities.
Reasons for selecting FreeOTP
As open-source software, FreeOTP can deliver faster updates and resolutions to issues like bugs and vulnerabilities for users. It stood out on my list for its extensive customization capabilities that aren’t feasible with other private or proprietary software.
Pricing
Features
- Two-factor authentication.
- Open-source software.
- Time-based One-Time Password.
- HMAC-based One-Time Password.
SEE: How to Establish an Effective Cybersecurity Awareness Program (TechRepublic Premium)
FreeOTP advantages and drawbacks
| Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|
| Easy-to-access and transparent open-source software. | Users need to have their mobile device with them for login, which may be less convenient compared to hardware-based 2FA solutions. |
| Robust 2FA support with TOTP and HOTP authentication methods. | Relying on a mobile device might pose a concern if the device is lost, damaged, or inaccessible. |
| Accessible on multiple platforms for Android and iOS devices. | |
| Functions offline without requiring an internet connection during authentication, enhancing dependability. |
How can I make a decision between Google Authenticator substitutes?
If you wish to explore substitutes for Google Authenticator to tailor your MFA method, manage multiple devices or users, prefer using a physical security key, or seek a company with various support options, you may want to consider alternatives. While companies providing MFA solutions aim for enhanced account security, variations exist in the level of security and functionalities affecting ease of deployment, utilization, and maintenance.
When choosing a product that fits your requirements, consider your budget and the most crucial features and traits for you. Reflect on variances in provided authentication layers, backup and restore opportunities, encryption protocols, customization, support preferences, and tools for managing user group permissions.
For instance, individuals or businesses susceptible to phishing attempts may value the assurance of a Yubico phishing-resistant security key. Similarly, organizations with employees requiring diverse permission levels might find Cisco’s Duo Policy Engine beneficial.
No matter the choice you make, implementing MFA adds a layer of security guarding against the consequences of unauthorized account access.
To learn more, take a look at our video feature on the Top Google Authenticator Alternatives below.
Methodology
While compiling this list, we took into account various factors to present you with the finest Google Authenticator alternatives. Some key aspects where these apps and services had to measure up are:
- Reputation: The software must originate from a reliable, reputable organization.
- Dependability: Minimal downtime is crucial to ensure continuous secure access to your accounts and data.
- Features: The selected apps offer a spectrum of features, selected based on their capacity to meet distinct user needs in ways that Google Authenticator and others cannot.
- User experience: Besides providing high security and unique features, a favorable user experience is equally vital, thus prioritizing options that are user-friendly.
- Value: While some top picks are free, others come at a cost. Nevertheless, the paid options present extraordinary value if you require and will utilize their additional features.
About Author
