Human-like robots are not a good concept

Why would Tesla and other corporations introduce robots that resemble humans when non-humanoid robots are highly capable?

One of the primary arguments in favor of designing robots to mimic the human body in terms of size, shape, and components is the fact that most of our surroundings, buildings, and vehicles are tailored for human use. By modeling robots after the human body, they can perform tasks like opening doors, sitting on chairs, climbing stairs, and functioning effectively in environments intended for humans.

While this reasoning may seem convincing initially, it does not withstand thorough examination. Work environments such as factories are set up to accommodate both humans and machinery. Factory floors, for instance, are predominantly designed for machines with wheels – they are typically flat, smooth, and hard. A robot equipped with wheels would demonstrate significantly higher efficiency compared to a bipedal walker that relies on a sophisticated computer system for movement. Other robot configurations can handle much heavier loads, achieve greater speed, and exhibit superior agility when contrasted with humanoid robots.

About Author

AndyC

Andy Curtis is an award-winning security consultant, researcher and public speaker. He has been working in the computer security industry since the early 1990s, having been employed by state and federal government, leading healthcare and banking providers across three continents. He has given talks about computer security for some of the world’s largest companies, worked with law enforcement agencies on investigations into hacking groups, and is a regular voice on TV and radio explaining IT security threats.

See author's posts