Examining the Impact of the Loper Bright Judgment on Cybersecurity Legislation
The impact of the Loper Bright ruling has been profound: the Supreme Court’s decision has overturned four decades of administrative law, opening the door to potential legal battles over the interpretation of previously unclear statutes by governmental entities. This piece delves into crucial queries for cybersecurity professionals and executives as we move into a more contentious phase of cybersecurity legislation.
Context
What Does the Loper Bright Verdict Entail?
By striking down the Chevron deference, the U.S. Supreme Court’s Loper Bright judgment asserts that courts, not agencies, will determine all pertinent legal issues arising from agency actions. According to the ruling, agency interpretations of statutes do not merit deference because the text of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is unambiguous. The court stressed that judicial bodies must independently assess whether an agency has adhered to its statutory mandate. Consequently, this judgment transfers the authority of statutory interpretation from federal agencies to the judiciary.
Exploring the Chevron Deference
Mandated by the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the Chevron deference demanded that courts defer to reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes made by federal agencies. For almost 40 years, courts abided by Chevron, deferring to agency interpretations if deemed reasonable in the face of statutory ambiguity.
What Initial Measures Should Corporations Contemplate to Ensure Compliance with Cybersecurity Regulations Potentially Subject to Legal Disputes?
No immediate changes have been made; nonetheless, to guarantee adherence to cybersecurity regulations that may be contested in court, companies should:
- Evaluate existing cybersecurity obligations to confirm their conformity with prevailing regulations rooted in explicit statutory mandates.
- Monitor court rulings and regulatory adjustments vigilantly. With the removal of Chevron deference, courts will scrutinize agency interpretations more meticulously.
- Be prepared to revise compliance protocols if legal or regulatory prerequisites evolve owing to judicial interpretations.
- Work in collaboration with legal professionals to navigate the evolving regulatory milieu.
Effective implementation of cybersecurity controls occurs when they are aligned with identified risks, encompassing regulatory mandates, legal obligations, and external hazards. Companies should review or eliminate controls in anticipation of future judicial interpretations linked to Loper Bright only if those controls were exclusively designed for regulatory compliance and did not mitigate additional risks. Companies must ensure that their controls are easily traceable to specified requirements, enabling swift assessment of the implications of any impending regulatory changes.
What Will be the Ripples of the Loper Bright Ruling on the Enforcement of Existing Cybersecurity Regulations by Entities like the FTC, SEC, and Others?
The Loper Bright decision is likely to render cybersecurity regulations more susceptible to legal challenges. With courts no longer deferring to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes, they will exercise independent judgment. This change could lead to increased litigations, enhanced scrutiny of regulations, and procedural delays. Noteworthy agencies possibly facing legal disputes post-Loper Bright are:
- FTC: Ongoing FTC regulatory activities, such as the Health Breach Notification Rule, may encounter challenges.
- SEC: Given the absence of cybersecurity mentions in the Securities and Exchange Acts of 1933 and 1934, the SEC’s imposition of cybersecurity disclosures within four days of identifying materiality may face opposition.
- GLBA: Financial institutions are now subject to extended cyber incident reporting regulations.
- TSA: Cybersecurity requirements for rail carriers and airport operators, as introduced by TSA emergency amendments in 2022, could undergo legal battles.
- CISA: CISA’s proposed regulation on the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 may face challenges owing to broad interpretations.
What Effects Could the Loper Bright Judgment Have on the Uniformity of Cybersecurity Regulations and Implementation across Different Jurisdictions?
The Loper Bright ruling may disrupt the uniformity of cybersecurity regulations and execution across diverse jurisdictions. By eliminating the Chevron deference, courts now possess enhanced authority to independently construe statutes, potentially leading to varied interpretations and applications of cybersecurity statutes. Such disparity may necessitate more frequent adjustments to corporate compliance frameworks due to heterogeneous interpretations across jurisdictions.
In What Ways Might the Dismissal of the Chevron Deference Influence the Evolution of Future Cybersecurity Regulations?
The abandonment of the Chevron deference could foster a more disjointed and incongruous regulatory landscape in the realm of cybersecurity. Federal agencies will need to furnish more compelling justifications and details for their regulatory decisions. This shift may intensify judicial scrutiny of existing regulations and proposed amendments, complicating the swift adaptation of agencies like the FTC and CISA to emerging threats.
Courts will contemplate the persuasiveness of agency interpretations, assigning weight to their expertise only if deemed highly informative and rooted in consistent rationale. This transformation is expected to raise the legal challenges against existing cybersecurity regulations and novel rulemaking initiatives, adding complexity to compliance endeavors.
What Role Might Judicial Interpretations Play in Delineating the Scope of Cybersecurity Regulations Post-Loper Bright?
Judicial interpretations are poised to play a pivotal role in defining the extent of cybersecurity regulations subsequent to the Loper Bright verdict. Courts will independently scrutinize the statutory authority of agencies, potentially ushering in a more scattered and incongruous regulatory atmosphere. This shift necessitates a reevaluation of compliance with regulatory norms and advocacy strategies.
Note: This engaging article was penned by Kayne McGladrey, Field CISO at Hyperproof.
About Author
