The 2025 Phishing Surge Proved One Thing: Chasing Doesn’t Work
Let’s get something out of the way: retrospectives can feel a bit like mandatory fun. Someone gathers up the year’s events, packages them into neat categories, and delivers “key takeaways” that land somewhere between obvious and forgettable.
The 2025 Phishing Surge Proved One Thing: Chasing Doesn’t Work
Let’s get something out of the way: retrospectives can feel a bit like mandatory fun. Someone gathers up the year’s events, packages them into neat categories, and delivers “key takeaways” that land somewhere between obvious and forgettable. This is not that.
2025 was the year phishing stopped being a nuisance and became a profession. Not in a good way. The ecosystem matured into a supply chain with subscription models, specialist vendors, and what can only be described as customer success for cybercriminals. The people trying to steal your credentials now have better operational efficiency than half the B2B SaaS market.
So rather than produce a highlight reel you’ll skim and forget, let’s examine what actually shifted in 2025 and what it means for the decisions you’ll make in 2026.
Phishing Is Now a Subscription Service
The single defining characteristic of 2025 was commoditization. Threat actors moved from building their own infrastructure to renting it. Services like RedVDS offered disposable hosting environments designed specifically for phishing operations. The operational advantage isn’t the technology itself; it’s the business model. When spinning up a new campaign requires less effort than filing a purchase order, attackers can operate at a tempo defenders were never designed to match.
Here’s what that looks like in practice: a threat actor launches a campaign, burns through a domain when it gets flagged, and spins up a replacement within hours. Rinse, repeat. The defender, meanwhile, is still writing a ticket about the first domain.
For CISOs, this reality requires a mental shift. You are not fighting individual attacks. You are competing against an adversary supply chain optimized for speed and replacement. Detection alone cannot keep pace. Disruption needs to become an operational function.
AI Made Phishing Pages Better
Phishing kits used to be templates. Attackers would download a spoofed login page, make some adjustments, and deploy it. The skill barrier was low, but the output was recognizable. Security teams got decent at spotting recycled indicators and known-bad page structures.
That changed. Tools like Darcula-suite integrated generative AI into the kit-building workflow. Instead of modifying templates, operators can now generate, localize, and customize pages on demand. The result is higher-fidelity impersonation across brands, languages, and regions, produced faster than security teams can catalog.
What this means: static signatures and “known-bad page” detection approaches are increasingly obsolete. The templates security teams trained on last quarter may have no relationship to what arrives next quarter. Detection strategies must shift toward intent and behavior. Anomalous login flows. Suspicious redirect chains. Impossible travel events. Token misuse. These signals remain useful even as visual quality improves.
Legitimate Tools Became Attack Surfaces
A pattern emerged in 2025 that deserves attention: threat actors stopped building everything from scratch and started repurposing legitimate platforms. Mainstream generative site-building tools can produce convincing login pages from minimal prompts. The irony is hard to miss. The same no-code revolution that democratized web development also democratized credential theft.
The implications extend beyond the phishing page itself. When malicious content rides on the infrastructure characteristics of mainstream platforms, simplistic allow/deny heuristics become liabilities. The traditional advice to “look for suspicious domains” falls apart when the domain belongs to a well-known service provider.
The defenders who made progress in 2025 did so by improving abuse reporting loops and response speed. Faster takedowns and tighter friction around repeated abuse increased attacker workload. It’s not glamorous work. But it’s effective.
GenAI Eliminated the “Bad Writing” Tell
For years, security awareness training leaned on a reliable crutch: poor grammar and awkward phrasing as warning signs. Employees were told to watch for misspellings, strange syntax, and tone inconsistencies. That advice is now actively harmful.
Malicious LLMs, including tools marketed as WormGPT 4 and KawaiiGPT, specialize in producing persuasive, role-accurate language. Executive tone. Finance terminology. Vendor communication patterns. These systems generate infinite variation with no linguistic tells. The “gut check” that protected some employees for years has been neutralized.
2025 effectively ended the era where defenders could rely on bad writing as a meaningful signal. Training programs that still emphasize spotting poor grammar are preparing employees for yesterday’s threat.
The organizations that adapted well shifted emphasis from “user detection” to “workflow resilience.” If a perfect lure can arrive in anyone’s inbox, the question becomes: what happens next? The answer should be verification built into the process. Out-of-band confirmation for payment changes. Dual approval for access escalations. Authentication steps that don’t rely on email alone.
What This Means for 2026
The four developments above follow a common pattern. Each represents a layer of the phishing value chain becoming more specialized, more accessible, and more difficult to disrupt at the individual incident level.
Disposable infrastructure enables fast campaign churn. AI-enhanced kits reduce skill requirements. Legitimate tools compress time-to-phish while borrowing trust cues. Malicious LLMs raise conversion rates by producing better pretexts.
This is why 2026 strategy should frame phishing as a conversion-rate and operational tempo problem, not merely an email filtering problem. The question is not whether malicious messages will land. They will. The question is whether the systems and processes that sit behind email can withstand that reality.
Three Priorities Stand Out.
Design for impact, not perfection. Perfect prevention was never realistic; now it’s mathematically implausible. CISOs should focus controls on reducing blast radius: phishing-resistant authentication, stronger session protections, strict conditional access, and monitoring for anomalous identity behavior. The strategic shift is from “stop the email” to “stop the outcome.”
Operationalize disruption. Ecosystem-level disruption is one of the few forces that consistently raises attacker cost. Brand monitoring, rapid abuse reporting, domain response playbooks, and tight escalation paths with providers should be standing functions, not incident response afterthoughts.
Harden the workflows that monetize phishing. The real losses concentrate in predictable places: payment diversion, vendor bank changes, payroll updates, mailbox rule manipulation, privileged access requests. The differentiator in 2026 will be process integrity: verification that forces legitimacy checks before money or access moves.
The Bigger Shift: From Reactive to Preemptive
Everything above points to a conclusion that extends beyond phishing into how security programs must evolve. The reactive model is breaking.
For two decades, the dominant cybersecurity paradigm has been detect and respond. Build walls. Watch for breaches. Respond when something gets through. That approach worked when attackers moved slower than defenders could adapt. It does not work when adversaries can generate novel attacks faster than signature databases update, spin up infrastructure faster than blocklists propagate, and craft persuasive content faster than employees can be trained to recognize it.
Gartner has been direct about this trajectory. Their research predicts that by 2030, preemptive cybersecurity solutions will account for 50% of IT security spending, up from less than 5% in 2024. That is not a minor adjustment. It represents a fundamental inversion of how organizations allocate security resources. The reasoning is mathematical: if threat actors can generate, test, and deploy attacks faster than security teams can detect and respond, the economics permanently favor the attacker. The only way to change that equation is to act before attacks land.
Preemptive security operates on three principles. Deny attackers the opportunity to initiate by eliminating exposure before it can be exploited. Deceive attackers away from critical assets by making the environment unpredictable. Disrupt attacks in progress before they achieve their objectives. This is not theoretical. It is the direction the entire industry is moving, and organizations that wait for the shift to complete will spend years catching up.
What Does This Mean For Email Security?
For email security specifically, preemptive means moving beyond gateway filtering toward AI-driven systems that learn organizational communication patterns, anticipate threat variations, and neutralize campaigns before they reach scale. It means detection that adapts in real time rather than waiting for threat intelligence feeds to update. It means automated remediation that removes malicious messages across mailboxes the moment a threat is identified, not after a human analyst triages an alert queue.
The organizations that treat 2026 as the year to get ahead of attackers, rather than chase them, will define what success looks like for everyone else. The ones still building faster versions of yesterday’s reactive playbook will find themselves easily thwarted.
2025 was the year phishing became a profession. 2026 is the year defenders decide whether to preempt their security response or keep playing catch-up. The threat actors have already made their choice. The question is whether you will make yours.
*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Blog authored by James Savard. Read the original post at: https://ironscales.com/blog/the-2025-phishing-surge-proved-one-thing-chasing-doesnt-work
About Author
