Artificial intelligence enterprises encounter setback in copyright dispute with visual creators

“In case an AI corporation benefits from material derived from copyrighted content belonging to others, they must distribute those profits, potentially through royalties,” mentioned Prashant Mali, a legal counsel specializing in data security and cyber legislation. “AI technology was never meant to be utilized liberally at the expense of creators’ privileges, and this judgment highlights the necessity for distinct guidelines in maintaining a balance between innovation and copyright safeguard.”

This ruling results from a prior verdict by Judge Orrick, who had thrown out several of the creators’ initial grievances in October but allowed them the opportunity to submit their lawsuit again. The creators, which include Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz, reinitiated their complaint in November with additional co-plaintiffs.

Judge Orrick’s latest ruling now authorizes them to advance with their copyright allegations.

About Author

AndyC

Andy Curtis is an award-winning security consultant, researcher and public speaker. He has been working in the computer security industry since the early 1990s, having been employed by state and federal government, leading healthcare and banking providers across three continents. He has given talks about computer security for some of the world’s largest companies, worked with law enforcement agencies on investigations into hacking groups, and is a regular voice on TV and radio explaining IT security threats.

See author's posts